I've called some of the offending journalists out on social media, which I encourage everyone to do.
They all seem to drink from the same fountain.
You'd basically need to know what biases which outlets have to what stories and apply a filter accordingly, which can be extremely time consuming.
They even did this when their own reporter, who was clearly marked PRESS was shot.
Here's the story as reported by the AP[1], notice the headline: "AP cameraman shot during Gaza protest", no mention of Israel and might even give the impression that Gazans shot him.
The vast majority of people only skim the headlines and AP knows this, so this is hardly an accident.
I have no bias in this conflict, I'm neither pro/anti palestenians/israelis, because I just cant wrap my head around it, and I refuse to believe what any major news media tries to feed people about this conflict.
If all of AP reports are this unbiased, then probably I'll have to start subscribing to them.
What I find interesting, though, is that I don't think it is necessarily editing bias. I think it's actually the opposite: poor editing. What I've found is that when I've found stories that are mistranslated, or which contain seemingly intentionally misleading information, it's actually the same reporters. It is really only a handful of reporters that seem to be responsible for all of the crap news stories. The problem is that the editors seem to let the stories through (possibly because they are money makers???).
I'm not going to name names (of reporters) because my "analysis" is really adhoc and probably also biased. However, I encourage people to look at the by-lines and see if you find any patterns with types of stories and their authors. Don't assume that because it's reported by a reputable news service that the information is correct and unbiased.