News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by m_mueller on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:46PM (#18544610)
Look up for jobs in weather agencies, climate research, ocean model research and computational physics.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by jacquesm on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @01:35PM (#18545192)
And lots of Finite Element Analysis packages still use Fortran under the hood.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by int_19h on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @11:17PM (#18549251)
I've noticed that Fortran comes up a lot when talking to people who do fluid dynamics simulations.

Curiously, it often does so in context of Python. One specific example I can remember was a library written in Fortran, with unit tests written in Python.

Re:Fortran is still a thing by m_mueller on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @04:13AM (#18550232)
Fortran and Python go together very well (they complement each other in just the right ways and there's all the bindings / data structure compatibility with Numpy that you need). Glue code / UI in Python, Numerics in Numpy + homegrown Fortran, that's how I'd implement a numerical model from scratch today.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by septc on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @09:54PM (#18557654)
Just out of curiosity, what do you use for calling Fortran from Python (e.g. f2py, ctypes)? Do you have any suggestion about how to combine them together (e.g., for parallel calculations)?
Re:Fortran is still a thing by m_mueller on Friday November 30, 2018 @07:43AM (#18568656)
So I haven't yet had the chance to do it myself, but yes I'd look at f2py first and how to integrate it with Numpy.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by pge on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @02:05PM (#18545530)
also a lot of computational fluid dynamics modeling (naval, aeronautical, automotive, etc.)
Re:Fortran is still a thing by tejassanap on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:53PM (#18544695)
Thanks.