News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by tejassanap on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:30PM (#18544424)
Do you know of any learning opportunities such as internships where one can learn and apply Fortran?
Re:Fortran is still a thing by rch on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @02:17PM (#18545673)
Re:Fortran is still a thing by msaharia on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @03:43PM (#18546480)
Huh. Don't think I have seen NCAR here before!
Re:Fortran is still a thing by m_mueller on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:46PM (#18544610)
Look up for jobs in weather agencies, climate research, ocean model research and computational physics.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by jacquesm on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @01:35PM (#18545192)
And lots of Finite Element Analysis packages still use Fortran under the hood.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by int_19h on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @11:17PM (#18549251)
I've noticed that Fortran comes up a lot when talking to people who do fluid dynamics simulations.

Curiously, it often does so in context of Python. One specific example I can remember was a library written in Fortran, with unit tests written in Python.

Re:Fortran is still a thing by m_mueller on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @04:13AM (#18550232)
Fortran and Python go together very well (they complement each other in just the right ways and there's all the bindings / data structure compatibility with Numpy that you need). Glue code / UI in Python, Numerics in Numpy + homegrown Fortran, that's how I'd implement a numerical model from scratch today.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by septc on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @09:54PM (#18557654)
Just out of curiosity, what do you use for calling Fortran from Python (e.g. f2py, ctypes)? Do you have any suggestion about how to combine them together (e.g., for parallel calculations)?
Re:Fortran is still a thing by m_mueller on Friday November 30, 2018 @07:43AM (#18568656)
So I haven't yet had the chance to do it myself, but yes I'd look at f2py first and how to integrate it with Numpy.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by pge on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @02:05PM (#18545530)
also a lot of computational fluid dynamics modeling (naval, aeronautical, automotive, etc.)
Re:Fortran is still a thing by tejassanap on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:53PM (#18544695)
Thanks.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by rootbear on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @01:29PM (#18545115)
It's still used at NASA. The NASA Center for Climate Simulation at Goddard does much of their climate work in Fortran.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by pmulv on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @02:20PM (#18545723)
I have a friend who writes modern fortran nearly everyday as an actuarial pension analyst in Manhattan. They hired him out of college having never written a "hello world" script. Hope that helps!
Re:Fortran is still a thing by RhysU on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @10:55PM (#18549178)
Dead language tallying the dead?
Re:Fortran is still a thing by kitd on Wednesday November 28, 2018 @04:18AM (#18550249)
I began my career 30 years ago writing actuarial valuations in Fortran77. Glad to see the industry hasn't changed (much).
Re:Fortran is still a thing by nouseforaname on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:50PM (#18544662)
Maybe universities. My mechanical engineering program taught fortran and had beowulf clusters running what was (presumably) fortran.
Re:Fortran is still a thing by C1sc0cat on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:32PM (#18544448)
At a Guess CERN and places like that
Re:Fortran is still a thing by tejassanap on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:42PM (#18544552)
The thing with such hardcore engineering stuff is that there are very few places one can learn them at, but they are also very very cool