Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intelligence?

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by conjectures on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @11:03AM (#18543427)

From a skim read this article is pretty sloppy. It argues that the human OEM theory of mind is in some way unique or unreproducible. This conclusion is completely unsupported by the text, which is just a sophisticated word salad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by nipponese on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @12:56PM (#18544726)

Well you gotta love and respect the site's mission statement: Whatever it is, we're against it

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by conjectures on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @01:06PM (#18544847)

Lol yeah. Including themselves, I guess.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by lynal on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @11:32AM (#18543747)

I'm reminded of the rule of thumb: if a headline asks a yes/no question, the answer is almost always "no."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by dominotw on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @11:35AM (#18543768)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by daferna on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @04:21PM (#18546903)

Thanks, saved me a click.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is Neuroscience a Bigger Threat than Artificial Intellige... by vokep on Tuesday November 27, 2018 @01:25PM (#18545065)

This is correct

[ Parent | on HN ]