Re:Thank you to dang and sctb
by danso on Thursday November 22, 2018 @08:41PM
(#18513785)
I didn't downvote but I think others might have because you leveled an allegation so vague as to be irrefutable. I think dang has been a great mod and have only seen the interactions that involve me, or have been upvoted. Doesn't mean I wouldn't be interested in seeing substantive criticism from those who've experienced differently.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Thank you to dang and sctb
by waterhouse on Friday November 23, 2018 @04:05AM
(#18515284)
If there were a search engine that, say, turned up comment-pairs where dang replied to chris_wot, then it would be easy to get a sampling of their (public) interactions. I doubt any normal search engines (or even hn.algolia.com) do it. (And both posters are active enough that going through history is impractical. BTW, as one data point, 14 of dang's last 36 comments contain the word "please".) Perhaps someone has a database of HN comments that could be queried in such a way. But yeah, in the absence of links or a pointer to such a database, it's not substantiated and so the reader's evaluation is going to depend primarily on their prior opinions.
It wouldn't cover situations where the mods took action or retaliated without publicly commenting. But to your question about a queryable database, such a thing exists on BigQuery: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17471117
edit: apparently it's updated daily, with 18,507,035 comments as of now: https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/bigquery-public-data...
It’s kind of hard to do. Almost certainly dang or another mod would rate limit or shadow ban me.
It’s their site to do as they will, but it strikes me as interesting that they are held up as saints when they are anything but. Note that I’m not saying they are monsters either, but as someone on the receiving end of dang’s conduct I personally cannot agree with this post. It’s not like they are really accountable for their actions.
> Almost certainly dang or another mod would rate limit or shadow ban me.
See that's where you lose me, I'm afraid. This is why it's vague to the point of being irrefutable.
They're just regular mods. On a toxic one-up community. I'd like then to at least have a courtesy of mentioning when someone is (shadow) banned.
Re:Thank you to dang and sctb
by reitanqild on Friday November 23, 2018 @01:27AM
(#18514745)
I think they don't shadow ban people anymore since sometime after pg left.
I am somewhat rate limited it seems for reasons but I won't complain. I'm possibly more annoying than them.