Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by FlyMoreRockets on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @04:54PM
(#18506419)
At this point, there are no long distance electric trains in the US. Odd, it seems like it would be mutually beneficial to have the electric grid run on rail right of way and be used to power trains.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by LanceH on Thursday November 22, 2018 @12:09AM
(#18507990)
I imagine it would bring some ability for load balancing moving more freight during specific hours.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by solarkraft on Thursday November 22, 2018 @04:56AM
(#18509021)
This seemed like a good idea at first, but I have a suspicion that it would mess with schedules.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by mulmen on Thursday November 22, 2018 @02:14AM
(#18508412)
Power lines can climb much steeper hills than trains.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by imtringued on Thursday November 22, 2018 @10:05AM
(#18510346)
Exactly! Hillclimbing is a huge weakness of trains which significantly increases the cost of rail construction.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by protomyth on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @07:09PM
(#18507065)
Texas has plenty of cargo trains with a pretty sophisticated setup.
There are currently at least two groups trying to do passenger trains between Austin, Dallas / Fort Worth, and Houston. I'm not sure what they want for Federal or State money.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by electricslpnsld on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @04:44PM
(#18506343)
Trains don't get you and your overseas goods across oceans (yet).
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by andrewflnr on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @04:48PM
(#18506384)
It may not be fast, but wind power is a proven technology for that application.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by goatlover on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @05:05PM
(#18506486)
It’s also not as economical. If your competitor uses shipping that’s weeks faster and more reliable, then you’re not staying in business long.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by rcMgD2BwE72F on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @05:24PM
(#18506593)
At some point, we'll make shipping companies pay for their heavy externalities (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality#Negative) and we'll have to choose between slow, clean and cheap or fast, dirty and expensive.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by stjohnswarts on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @06:58PM
(#18507009)
Shipping (boats onna water) aren't the 90% problem to solve, that is all on land. You solve that before you worry about the other 10%
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by mrpopo on Thursday November 22, 2018 @01:56AM
(#18508358)
Nothing is a "90% problem", even on land.
Tankers' environmental impact is disastrous, although they actually are comparatively quite CO2-efficient for shipping goods. It's just that there is so many of them now.
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by rcMgD2BwE72F on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @05:03PM
(#18506474)
Shipping accounts for ~2% of total US oil consumption so that's a tiny little chunk.
Source: https://3kpnuxym9k04c8ilz2quku1czd-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/w...
Re:Texas Is About to Create OPEC’s Worst Nightmare
by hnphillipj on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @05:17PM
(#18506549)
Air is listed right beside that, which is probably closer to what he was referring two. Combined, they sit at 10%. Not as much as he thought, but nothing to scoff at.
What about trains?