Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by bouncycastle on Thursday November 08, 2018 @07:45PM
(#18411483)
I'm not talking about ICOs. In fact, EtherDelta was one of the few projects that launched without an ICO, and before the ICO craze.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by wmf on Thursday November 08, 2018 @08:07PM
(#18411610)
EtherDelta allows you to trade illegal securities, therefore EtherDelta is also illegal.
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by bouncycastle on Thursday November 08, 2018 @08:40PM
(#18411763)
It allowed you to trade any ERC-20 token, indiscriminately. If you point an ERC-20 contract address to it, it would add it automatically to the user interface.
Also, I'm not talking about if it's illegal or not, the point that I can't get over is that the ED guy didn't scam or hurt anyone. It was an honest, transparent, open source project.
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by covemarkets on Thursday November 08, 2018 @09:42PM
(#18411995)
there are several issues at play: rules around trading securities and securities fraud. EtherDelta broke certain rules and that/s why the founder got fined about 400k in total. You are correct that EtherDelta wasn't a fraud or a scam - and that's why there is no criminal proceeding, no accusation of securities fraud.
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by browsercoin on Thursday November 08, 2018 @07:59PM
(#18411559)
the SEC doesn't give a shit.
if it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it's probably one in their eyes.
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by solveit on Thursday November 08, 2018 @08:07PM
(#18411608)
Coburn never would have settled if the SEC were that sloppy. You might disagree with the laws involved, but I'm pretty sure they had a decent legal case.
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by browsercoin on Friday November 09, 2018 @10:49AM
(#18415250)
he's not in the clear from civil lawsuits which I'm sure this SEC settlement sets a precedent.