Re:Why Jupyter is data scientists’ computational notebook of...
by gbrown on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @03:03PM
(#18340235)
For me, markdown is meant to be readable even when not rendered. I could see how not having persistent graphs and tables might be an issue, but my own philosophy is to start fresh each time - I treat it like a templating language with some convenient rendering features for prototyping, rather than like an IDE.
Your last point also has an upside - it's using different engines (Rmarkdown vs. Sweave). I can write whatever HTML or LaTeX code I want, depending on what's appropriate. I wouldn't want to have to make web documents with LaTeX, nor would I want to make PDFs with HTML.
Re:Why Jupyter is data scientists’ computational notebook of...
by mike_ivanov on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @06:11AM
(#18344452)
> No inline rendering of markdown.
That's incorrect, take a look here -> https://blog.rstudio.com/2016/10/05/r-notebooks
No inline rendering of markdown.
Opening an .Rmd file is a lottery to see if rendered graphs and tables still exists.
Tables render completely differently in editor, HTML and pdf