So, if anything, I give it to Netflix that at least they're being honest about it, as opposed to lots of other "we're changing the world", cultish organizations that talk a lot about how "we're all a big family", but then when the going gets tough all that goes out the window in the interests of "maximizing shareholder value".
If that behavior extends outside of things you _should_ control (e.g. you try to control your friends and acquaintances), then it can be considered psychopathic or sociopathic. If you're just trying to minimize harm to things you control, then I'd argue that it's normal.
The CEO of a company is very much interested in running things efficiently. Without more information, there's really nothing to suggest this CEO has a mental disorder.
Is this not the definition of a psychopath?
This really does sound like hell to me. Then again a lot of modern corporate culture especially in tech seems to be moving toward this type of hell. Basically a form of social Darwinism.
Life and more specifically happiness is not efficient. Maximizing profit and growth and performance might work better unencumbered by emotions, survival of only the fittest, but does that lead to happiness?