Re:Unicorn: lightweight, multi-platform, multi-architecture ...
by lstodd on Thursday October 25, 2018 @01:29PM
(#18302643)
Why didn't they name it Multicorn?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unicorn: lightweight, multi-platform, multi-architecture ...
by empaone on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:00PM
(#18303576)
That name is also taken:
Re:Unicorn: lightweight, multi-platform, multi-architecture ...
by johnhenry on Friday October 26, 2018 @02:11AM
(#18307122)
Disappointing that their logo is just a unicorn. :/
Re:Unicorn: lightweight, multi-platform, multi-architecture ...
by therein on Thursday October 25, 2018 @02:02PM
(#18303014)
That would be a pretty good name. Has the added benefit of sounding like multicore. Other alternatives I can think of are cpucorn or even silicorn.
Re:Unicorn: lightweight, multi-platform, multi-architecture ...
by edoceo on Thursday October 25, 2018 @08:32PM
(#18305848)
> silicorn
Trademark that, it's awesome
Re:Unicorn: lightweight, multi-platform, multi-architecture ...
by EvanAnderson on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:26PM
(#18303800)
(I cannot resist making a They Might be Giants reference.)
There's precdent for "Omnicorn" [1]-- after all, "On its head is every manner of horn".