Re:Aptoide wins court battle against Google in landmark case
by ionised on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @05:37AM
(#18290928)
Sounds like heroin dealer logic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Aptoide wins court battle against Google in landmark case
by icebraining on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @05:47AM
(#18290964)
Will Google pay me damages if they let someone distribute malware on the Play Store, as has happened before? As far as I know, they won't, so how is Aptoide any worse?
Re:Aptoide wins court battle against Google in landmark case
by lstodd on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @06:30AM
(#18291141)
Still true, heroin or not.
Re:Aptoide wins court battle against Google in landmark case
by SmellyGeekBoy on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @07:51AM
(#18291559)
Is there a hard drug equivalent of Godwin's law?
Re:Aptoide wins court battle against Google in landmark case
by Markoff on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @11:46AM
(#18293411)
you are right, we should ban Chrome and Google search for providing access to pirated apps
Re:Aptoide wins court battle against Google in landmark case
by ionised on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @12:09PM
(#18293686)
That wasn't the point I was making.
My point is that saying it's all the consumers responsibility is a highly one-sided argument in favour of the vendor/service provider.
The amount of work a person would have to do to research every facet of every product they buy is insurmountable. There is no possible way for them to know everything about a product they are thinking of buying or using.
Expecting the average user to know which apps on any given app store are ridden with malware is a mighty tall order.
The customer will always have some level of ignorance about the product, so some measure of consumer protection is required.
It's unrealistic.