News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on WebAssembly’s post-MVP future. Parent comment

Re:WebAssembly’s post-MVP future by voltagex_ on Monday October 22, 2018 @11:45PM (#18280586)
WinForms or WPF? I can throw together a (terrible) HTML page faster than I can remember how MVVM is meant to work.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WebAssembly’s post-MVP future by thrower123 on Tuesday October 23, 2018 @07:16AM (#18282374)
I'm a lover of WinForms, since I cut my teeth on VB6 and MFC... it's surprising how decent you can make things look with a little polishing.

It's nuts that visual layout editors for the web have, if anything, regressed from the WebForms editor in Visual Studio 2008.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WebAssembly’s post-MVP future by pjmlp on Tuesday October 23, 2018 @03:01AM (#18281315)
MVVM is meant to work the same way as Angular bindings work.

In any case you aren't obliged to use MVVM in WPF, it is just a best practice for easier unit testing and composability. Then again Web Components are only now starting to be a thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]