> Our quest for greater page-speed optimizations reached a point were we considered jQuery as unnecessary overhead.
Their 'conditions for removal' are half made up of reasons they want to remove jQuery. Makes no sense.
Which one of the 4 reasons were "made up"? The last reason may not be technical but it's a reason we wanted to exploit. Looks like it worked ;)
That’s the exact opposite of a technical reason. Actually sound like following the hype.