News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Futurism Has a Cultural Blindspot (2015) by whatshisface on Saturday October 13, 2018 @06:44PM (#18210412)
>“Marriage Rebranded” – Short-term or “beta” marriages offer couples the chance to test the waters before being legally bound. People expect less from marriage.

Haha, someone should let this author know about dating.

Re:Why Futurism Has a Cultural Blindspot (2015) by retsibsi on Saturday October 13, 2018 @08:22PM (#18210691)
> dating

Sounds more like pre-marital cohabitation (which is also already common), but perhaps with a more explicit and formalised sense that this is a time-limited 'trial phase'.

I wonder why this goes together with reduced expectations; I can imagine it leading to a resurgance in the belief that marriage is for life, by reducing the number of impulsive and semi-informed marriages. But maybe that goes hand in hand with the rejection of some less-realistic romantic ideals we have about the role of a life partner?

Re:Why Futurism Has a Cultural Blindspot (2015) by valesco on Sunday October 14, 2018 @09:33AM (#18212802)
>Sounds more like pre-marital cohabitation (which is also already common), but perhaps with a more explicit and formalised sense that this is a time-limited 'trial phase'.

That already exists, at least in Belgium (legal cohabitation) and in France (PACS).

Re:Why Futurism Has a Cultural Blindspot (2015) by dleslie on Sunday October 14, 2018 @12:39PM (#18213721)
And in British Columbia, Canada; here there is no meaningful differentiation between a contractual Marriage and a common-law Marriage by cohabitation.