Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by stanmancan on Monday October 08, 2018 @05:52PM (#18171639)

Big companies typically don't go after small niches. There are so many of them available they can't possibly pursue them all, because ultimately you don't know which one will take off. The book The Innovator's Dilemma focuses on this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by mindgam3 on Monday October 08, 2018 @06:52PM (#18172015)

Exactly. My point is that going after small niches until one works would have been a better strategy to come up with a viable Facebook competitor. This could probably only happen with a “startup within big company” model where they had the freedom to test out a bunch of crazy stuff for a long time without pressure from management.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by reaperducer on Monday October 08, 2018 @10:18PM (#18172873)

Big companies typically don't go after small niches.

Big companies go after niches all the time. Many microbrews are owned by massive multi-national breweries. Huge drug companies chase niches every day. Giant food companies release ethic niche foods every month.

Whomever told you that there isn’t big money in niches or that they’re not worth going after is someone you should stop taking advice from.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by strictnein on Monday October 08, 2018 @11:55PM (#18173214)

> "Big companies go after niches all the time. Many microbrews are owned by massive multi-national breweries."

AB Inbev, et al isn't targeting a niche by buying microbrews, they're building a portfolio that gives them access to growing and profitable craft brew market that's 1/4th of the total US beer market.

   Retail dollar sales of craft increased 8%, up to $26.0 billion, 
   and now account for more than 23% of the $111.4 billion U.S. beer market.

https://www.brewersassociation.org/statistics/national-beer-...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by stanmancan on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @02:30AM (#18173749)

It very much depends on the market. This is the reason why Seagate and Western Digital aren’t big names in the SSD market. They dominated the mechanical drive market for years (and still do!) but by the time SSDs were worth pursuing, other companies were light years ahead of them.

Google isn’t really in the business of filling small niches. That’s why they kill so many products that have small but passionate user bases. It’s just not worth their time and money so they shut the products down. This is why I can’t see them trying to start with a small social media niche and slowly expand to a bigger market. It’s a great idea; but seems to go against everything they do.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by Deganta on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @03:18AM (#18173932)

That's because HDDs and SSDs are actually very different on the inside. They do roughly the same, but just because a company is good at manufacturing HDDs does not mean that it can also produce good SSDs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shutting Down Google+ for Consumers by dannyw on Monday October 08, 2018 @10:35PM (#18172931)

The typical SV wisdom is that you want to find a bit market you can monopolise. While good for startups, this doesn’t apply to big companies.

[ Parent | on HN ]