Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2
by bal00ns on Friday September 28, 2018 @05:21PM
(#18097165)
Don't forget
Python - 28 years
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2
by zimbatm on Friday September 28, 2018 @06:11PM
(#18097470)
And finally, Perl - 30 years
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2
by kbenson on Friday September 28, 2018 @07:01PM
(#18097729)
Thanks. I was going to be a little depressed if after all that someone didn't jump in with Perl. :)
That said, it's frightfully close to 31 years... [1]
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2
by JohnL4 on Friday September 28, 2018 @10:20PM
(#18098364)
$_&-++()/+&_$@%%":;!!?)(-_# or die
Many of these languages, while productive in their own ways, almost universally need a framework to extend to the web.
The few languages were web-first were often chastised for not being complete languages.
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2
by jacob019 on Friday September 28, 2018 @08:34PM
(#18098056)
Not sure what you mean. A basic HTTP webserver can be implemented in a couple dozen lines of code using only sockets in most languages. Something more complex requires more code, which is often packed into a "framework", it doesn't belong baked into the language.
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2
by j45 on Saturday September 29, 2018 @11:49PM
(#18104363)
Ruby uses a framework like Rails to reach the web more effectively.
Python can use a framework like Django to reach the web more effectively.
Compared to..
A language like PHP in the beginning was more directly coupled to the web (for better or worse).
Interesting, I didn't know Ruby has been around just as long as PHP. I still would choose PHP if my opinion matters, just from my experience with the slow performance of ruby on rails when I gave it a go just a few years back.
PHP - 23 years
Ruby - 23 years
Java - 23 years
JavaScript (nodejs) - 22 years (9 years)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language#E...