Re:NewSQL databases fail to guarantee consistency and I blam...
by toast0 on Friday September 21, 2018 @08:28PM
(#18043740)
I think you can (and clearly should) be ready for your big boxes to go down. And it is much more painful to bounce a large box than a small box. But that doesn't mean having say 4x [1] big boxes is strictly worse than having a whole bunch of smaller boxes.
[1] one pair in two locations, basically the minimum amount, unless you're really latency insensitive so you could have one in three locations.
[1] one pair in two locations, basically the minimum amount, unless you're really latency insensitive so you could have one in three locations.