NewSQL databases fail to guarantee consistency and I blame Spanner

Re:NewSQL databases fail to guarantee consistency and I blam... by lllr_finger on Friday September 21, 2018 @05:59PM (#18042968)

My experience is that scaling up can lead to owning pets instead of cattle. It's never fun having a 1TB ATS instance that's acting funky but you're terrified of bouncing it. That's more a devil's advocate anecdote than an argument against scaling up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NewSQL databases fail to guarantee consistency and I blam... by toast0 on Friday September 21, 2018 @08:28PM (#18043740)

I think you can (and clearly should) be ready for your big boxes to go down. And it is much more painful to bounce a large box than a small box. But that doesn't mean having say 4x [1] big boxes is strictly worse than having a whole bunch of smaller boxes.

[1] one pair in two locations, basically the minimum amount, unless you're really latency insensitive so you could have one in three locations.

[ Parent | on HN ]