Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower
by jakobegger on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @03:07PM
(#18018180)
They use a grid of coils. By activating multiple adjacent coils, it behaves like one big coil. From a physics perspective it's really neat: the magnetic fields of opposing currents in adjacent wires should cancel. But the price you pay is that you have the charging current flowing through more length of wire, and more resistive losses (heat).
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower
by toomuchtodo on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @07:27PM
(#18020235)
Phased array inductive charging. Fascinating!
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower
by joombaga on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @02:36PM
(#18017915)
21-24 is a weird range
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower
by tcfunk on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @03:07PM
(#18018179)
As someone who knows basically nothing about designing electronic devices, my initial thought is 3 rows of 7 coils or 3 rows of 8 coils? This wouldn't make it a range, though, so much as an either/or situation.
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower
by jakobegger on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @03:08PM
(#18018198)
Would probably make more sense to choose some hexagonal pattern.
Presumably they detect where the device is and engage an appropriate coil. Quick search on amazon found a few charging pads with multiple coils.