News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by TrainedMonkey on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @01:28PM (#18017286)
They use multiple coils: "we can confirm is comprised of between 21 and 24 power coils".

Presumably they detect where the device is and engage an appropriate coil. Quick search on amazon found a few charging pads with multiple coils.

Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by jakobegger on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @03:07PM (#18018180)
They use a grid of coils. By activating multiple adjacent coils, it behaves like one big coil. From a physics perspective it's really neat: the magnetic fields of opposing currents in adjacent wires should cancel. But the price you pay is that you have the charging current flowing through more length of wire, and more resistive losses (heat).
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by toomuchtodo on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @07:27PM (#18020235)
Phased array inductive charging. Fascinating!
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by joombaga on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @02:36PM (#18017915)
21-24 is a weird range
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by tcfunk on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @03:07PM (#18018179)
As someone who knows basically nothing about designing electronic devices, my initial thought is 3 rows of 7 coils or 3 rows of 8 coils? This wouldn't make it a range, though, so much as an either/or situation.
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by jakobegger on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @03:08PM (#18018198)
Would probably make more sense to choose some hexagonal pattern.
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by tcfunk on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @11:58AM (#18025137)
Oh, good point!
Re:What Really Happened to Apple’s Airpower by Drdrdrq on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @02:42PM (#18017975)
It's a weird design.