News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by some_account on Thursday September 06, 2018 @02:33PM (#17928382)
Let's dumb down the internet even more because non technical users feel confused. Maybe we can actually remove the url field and just let the isp decide where they should go? They could offer a choice of 10 popular sites, like TV channels.. :)
Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by rmason on Thursday September 06, 2018 @02:38PM (#17928427)
Actually Google's long term plan is to do away with the URL completely, they just haven't figured out how yet.

https://www.wired.com/story/google-wants-to-kill-the-url/

Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by download13 on Thursday September 06, 2018 @03:06PM (#17928717)
We're always going to need to see URLs. They're not going away. They're just talking about a better default view to show the user relevant information about where they are, which would be a good thing.

Being generous, maybe half of users can look at a URL and immediately identify the domain they are on. That's terrible, and goes a long way to explaining why phishing attacks are so prevalent.

I'm actually pretty excited to see what they come up with. If it's even marginally better than what we have now I'd be all for it. I'm guessing they'll end up showing some combination of the domain and page title by default (which might incentivize more sites to FIX THEIR GODDAM TITLE SCHEMES!).

Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by josefx on Thursday September 06, 2018 @05:41PM (#17929827)
> We're always going to need to see URLs.

I can see the future now: User enters his target (mybank) into the Google search bar on his Google Android device, the device opens Google Chrome with the Google amp page form mybank already loaded. The user never has to worry about urls or where exactly he is entering his banking information and login critera. Google makes everything a clean and seamless experience and user never has to leave its warm embrance.

Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by nofunsir on Thursday September 06, 2018 @06:27PM (#17930186)
Add eyeball tracking into this mix, and we can "allow" users to "experience" unskippable ads.

In all seriousness, I have no doubt this is due largely to Google's frustration at Ad Blockers. If there is no URL, and you're in the Google Garden protocol, there is no way to block ads, or at least no way to NOT download them.

Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by muraiki on Thursday September 06, 2018 @09:31PM (#17931235)
AOL keywords all over again. It's all about building a moat.
Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by luckman212 on Thursday September 06, 2018 @03:01PM (#17928671)
Great idea! Hey, since these are non-technical users, why don't we just eliminate those pesky hard-to-use computers and just put the whole thing inside their TV? Y'know, kinda like 23 years ago... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSN_TV
Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL by pmccarren on Thursday September 06, 2018 @02:42PM (#17928480)
I also wouldn't put it past the average consumer to prefer 'installing' a website/webapp into their browser as they do an app..