News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by cheeze on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @03:03PM (#17911836)
Meanwhile, Mozilla is pushing forward in that area!

https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2018/08/30/changing-...

I'm almost 100% Firefox at this point. I trust Mozilla.

Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by kareemm on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @03:09PM (#17911886)
I trust Mozilla and have zero trust in Google. But I just switched back to Chrome after an experiment with Firefox. It’s just too much of a resource hog vs Chrome. Hopefully they sort that out soon.
Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by kart23 on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @11:38PM (#17914858)
Really? What use case? I've had the opposite experience, ff uses much less ram than chrome.
Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by kareemm on Wednesday September 05, 2018 @08:39AM (#17917345)
Anecdotally lots of tabs open (30+) in Firefox uses more RAM than Chrome and brings my 2017 MBP to its knees.
Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by rys on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @04:04PM (#17912330)
Resource usage is worth more than your privacy?
Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by testvox on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @03:10PM (#17911895)
I'm on waterfox. Mozilla lost my trust when they started installing advertising extensions without user permission.

https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/16/16784628/mozilla-mr-robo...

Re:Chrome's turning 10, here's what's new by orf on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @04:44PM (#17912625)
Poor play on Mozilla's part, sure, and they paid their price. But it seems pretty damn silly to switch off Firefox for good because of this. In fact you'd be directly impacting the only browser vendor that does care about your privacy, reducing their ability to push forward with privacy focused initiatives. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face!

But, if you want to use a poorly maintained, out of date and insecure fork of Firefox privacy reasons (as if Mozilla is somehow terrible in this area!) then go for it, but understand you're sacrificing your security for no particularly good reason whilst simultaneously reducing their impact in influencing the design of a privacy orientated web.