News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Sear... by brianbreslin on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @12:50PM (#17860418)
this got me curious and i found this post about this: http://www.unz.com/isteve/great-moments-in-google-american-i...
Re:Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Sear... by closetohome on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @02:34PM (#17861518)
You found an alt-right blog complaining about a glitch in an algorithm that accidentally promoted afraican americans?

Shocking.

Re:Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Sear... by brianbreslin on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @10:23AM (#17868402)
oh I wasn't endorsing it. Just pointing out that someone else had already written about this key point.
Re:Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Sear... by DuskStar on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @07:42PM (#17863931)
In all seriousness, are we not allowed to complain about glitches now, particularly if the glitch means 'increased diversity'?
Re:Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Sear... by lotu on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @11:49PM (#17865443)
It is called understanding context. This isn’t a thread about weird tech glitches it is a thread about Donald Trump accusing Google of liberal bias; something that apprentlly involves showing more black people than neccassary in search results.

If you lay out the game theory brining this up in this context you are implying that this is part of some vast liberal conspiracy. That is the problem.

Re:Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Sear... by DuskStar on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @12:17AM (#17865578)
Well, that's a slightly different question.

If the article is on Trump claiming that Google politically biases search results, Google having a history of returning suboptimal results in a way that is "stereotypically liberal" would be some decent supporting evidence - someone having done something before increases the prior probability of them having done so again. If that's actually accurate, of course.

Now, it seems pretty clear to me that this was a bug (and one I see in other, non-political search results) and that lowers the credibility of the criticism. I'd still rather have both sides make their strongest arguments though, and that includes pointing out prior occurrences that might suggest a pattern.