Re:OpenPGPjs has passed an independent security audit
by rasengan on Thursday August 16, 2018 @12:30PM
(#17776092)
Nothing you said here addressed the facts that were provided. Good luck!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenPGPjs has passed an independent security audit
by prophesi on Thursday August 16, 2018 @01:09PM
(#17776518)
I'm sure the poster was addressing "Focus on the facts. Not the messenger."
As was listed, there are plenty of good reasons to learn about the messenger, just like how looking up my comment history will show my propensity for calling this argument out. You know my ulterior motives and where I'm coming from.
Re:OpenPGPjs has passed an independent security audit
by yacn on Thursday August 16, 2018 @03:46PM
(#17777881)
Well one things certain: I'll never use Private Internet Access after this ridiculous comment from you[0] not even three months ago.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17261149 -- need to have "showdead" enabled in profile
Re:OpenPGPjs has passed an independent security audit
by rasengan on Thursday August 16, 2018 @04:13PM
(#17778086)
I stand by that statement.
Re:OpenPGPjs has passed an independent security audit
by frankzinger on Friday August 17, 2018 @03:29AM
(#17780951)
Those types of comments (yours and the general back-and-forth with ProtonMail) make the VPN industry look like it's full of sharks. It's hurting all of you. It makes you look unprofessional. Before seeing this I had a favourable impression of PIA, but not anymore.
EDIT: I'm sure the competition is intense and I'm not sure I would be able to rise above it myself but I think you need to be aware of what it looks like.
Re:OpenPGPjs has passed an independent security audit
by rasengan on Sunday August 19, 2018 @09:44AM
(#17794278)
It may be full of sharks. Specifically, though, my issues are with the two companies who pretend they are privacy companies and aren’t.
They bring shame to our industry, and further, shame to our cause.
I will stand up against them everyday regardless of what kind of repercussions come to me. That’s what it means to protect people’s privacy.
Cheers!