News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by baybal2 on Thursday August 16, 2018 @02:02AM (#17772301)
How stupid it is to spend so much effort on compartmentalising their intel net in the country, but have all spies report by dialing in into the same website in a country employing few brigades worth of people reading tcpdumps 24/7?

Compare that to one way coded messages over hf radio: a place for pick up of a dead drop in n days is broadcasted, then it is picked up by a man who reads it, destroys it, and gtfos from the country. In that scheme nobody in any way contacts anybody in real time other that the HQ.

Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by brown9-2 on Thursday August 16, 2018 @08:18AM (#17773962)
One would hope they created a new hostname/IP for each source, but even then it is astonishing that they used the same communication method for so many sources.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by dsl on Thursday August 16, 2018 @08:10PM (#17779428)
> Compare that to one way coded messages over hf radio

Having a shortwave radio in your possession is justification enough to haul you in for questing in some countries.

There is also relatively little "radio traffic" to inspect relative to internet traffic.

Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by sevensor on Friday August 17, 2018 @11:22AM (#17783498)
Perhaps, but given the volume and variety of modern electronics, it's easier than ever for a receiver to look like something else, at least if you don't crack open the case. An antenna can be harder to conceal, but you can often pick up transmissions by tying into unconventional antennas, like the rebar in a slab of concrete, or a long metal railing. You could probably fit a purpose-built receiver / demodulator for FT8 in a usb stick.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by nasredin on Thursday August 16, 2018 @12:08PM (#17775864)
There's still "number stations" broadcasting over shortwave radio.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it?!

Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by etrevino on Friday August 17, 2018 @10:45AM (#17783174)
Number stations, though, are usually used for things like one-time pads or to send a previously agreed upon command. Detailed instructions are not really what number stations are good for.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by baybal2 on Friday August 17, 2018 @12:14PM (#17783839)
time, date, longitude, latitude is just below the length of an average number station transfer
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by nerdponx on Thursday August 16, 2018 @06:36AM (#17773466)
My guess is that this is actually relatively new system that was implemented after the criticisms in the week of the September 11 attacks. One of the stories you keep hearing is that the plot was not discovered in time because agencies were not sharing enough information.