News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by dekhn on Monday August 13, 2018 @03:48PM (#17753023)
is there a service that turns these into readable correspondence to the editor? because I am not going to read a series of tweets alleging fraud. It's like there is an entire user-visible packetizing mechanism in the way of the content.
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by phyzome on Monday August 13, 2018 @04:20PM (#17753289)
https://threadreaderapp.com/ will do it -- https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1027717419400392705.html

and yes, it's ridiculous that this is necessary

Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by noja on Monday August 13, 2018 @04:23PM (#17753323)
Have you got something that will handle replies (in date order) too?
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by paulgb on Monday August 13, 2018 @05:03PM (#17753619)
It's not quite what you're asking for, but Treeverse represents the conversation (including replies) as a tree https://github.com/paulgb/Treeverse (disclosure: I wrote it)
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by tannerwj on Monday August 13, 2018 @04:32PM (#17753397)
Very handy, thanks
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by _Microft on Monday August 13, 2018 @04:22PM (#17753308)
If you do not like to read a thread of tweets on Twitter, ping @threadreaderapp with the word "unroll" on the last comment and a bot will convert the thread into a single post and add the link to it in a reply to your request.
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by icedchai on Monday August 13, 2018 @05:13PM (#17753681)
It's almost like Twitter isn't intended for this sort of communication.
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by dekhn on Monday August 13, 2018 @08:54PM (#17754823)
it definitely isn't but unfortunately some of the smartest and most informative people have moved to Twitter and so we have to read what we can where we can
Re:Fraud in superconductor physics by Myrmornis on Monday August 13, 2018 @05:05PM (#17753637)
Scrolling worked fine for me.