Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by nkrisc on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:28PM
(#17708077)
Your DNA is hardly private. You leave it everywhere you go. If someone wanted it they'd only have to follow you around for a short while.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by digi_owl on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:32PM
(#17708127)
And that kind of following around was what certain secret police forces did back in the day. And it was inefficient unless they already had a reason to spend manhours on you.
Now however the computer will do it, virtually for free, and then the hoard of data can be dug through for incriminating (or socially awkward) information.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by LinuxBender on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:37PM
(#17708167)
I hold a copyright on my DNA.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by moftz on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:52PM
(#17708300)
No you don't, you are not the creator of it therefore have no claim to copyright. It is not an original work of authorship. You can have a patent on DNA but not on naturally occurring DNA according to the supreme court.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by vasili111 on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @03:08PM
(#17709592)
>you are not the creator of it therefore have no claim to copyright.
So his/her parents hold the copyright?
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by LinuxBender on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:47PM
(#17708814)
Overruled. I will charge 42M per minute to unauthorized copies of my DNA. My shadow ninjas will sneak into their vaults and take back every single strand of my DNA.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by notyourwork on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:42PM
(#17708223)
Which means what in context of this conversation?