Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by notadoc on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:22PM
(#17666036)
Why is this particular presentation format better than a good old fashioned blog post?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by pavlov on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:51PM
(#17666309)
For the writer, this format has the same advantage as a tweetstorm: they get feedback that's very granular because each tweet / text block / whatever has its own reaction counters.
It can be surprisingly revealing to see that a particular paragraph got 100 likes and the next one got 15, for example. That data can be used to hone future writing for the audience's taste.
Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by vilen on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:30PM
(#17666114)
I enjoy reading in this format since the story can be told over time and through separate posts. Each post is like a mini story of its own. Also it is nice to see a discussion referencing specific posts. It is different, but I like it.
Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by saagarjha on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:38PM
(#17666183)
Except in this particular case each post was barely a minute apart.
Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by sigjuice on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:33PM
(#17666137)
This format is not too different from the textbook definition of a "blog post"
Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by jccalhoun on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @11:33PM
(#17669080)
It isn't.
Reading it I was like "what the hell is this? Is this some kind of reformatting of a series of tweets or something?" but it turns out it is some new format that the author is behind.
No thanks.
Re:A time in 1994 when Steve Jobs got to use a device like a...
by fourseventy on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:29PM
(#17666103)
agreed