Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by slededit on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @02:27AM
(#17598577)
But our eyes are much smaller and better performing. Surely a large sensor is not a fundamental requirement with the exception of depth of field.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by anfractuosity on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @03:04AM
(#17598719)
I thought this was interesting
"One reason for the saccadic movement of the human eye is that the central part of the retina—known as the fovea—which provides the high-resolution portion of vision is very small in humans, only about 1–2 degrees of vision, but it plays a critical role in resolving objects.[citation needed] By moving the eye so that small parts of a scene can be sensed with greater resolution, body resources can be used more efficiently. " from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade
Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by sschueller on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @02:44AM
(#17598640)
Aren't eyes actually quite bad and most the brain is doing the heavy lifting? We all have a huge blind spot yet we don't perceive it.
Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by kevincox on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @01:21PM
(#17603117)
The original computational photography.
Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by slavik81 on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @03:22AM
(#17598805)
The human eye is enormous compared to a smartphone camera, and the retina is still larger than the 1 inch squared sensor he mentioned. What exactly are you talking about?
Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by dzhiurgis on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @05:02AM
(#17599238)
100MP IIRC - so not that enormous anymore compared with this sensor.
The nerves that connect to brain are impressive tho, the thickest in our body.
Re:Sony Releases Stacked CMOS Sensor for Smartphones with 48...
by AstralStorm on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @03:51AM
(#17598935)
That eye size difference is mostly due to much wider field of view and adaptability to pretty close macro cases.