News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by Aetius on Thursday September 30, 2010 @07:30PM (#1745303)
This is, after all, NPR...no surprise the war was prominent as they have a decidedly progressive news team. I won't call NPR liberal, but certainly left of center, and very critical (as they should be) of the wars.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by kscaldef on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:03PM (#1745382)
I think the bias in the table actually goes the other way. By breaking down, and omitting parts of, military spending, they make it look relatively minor compared to SS, Medicare, and Medicaid. They have also chosen to display SS intakes, not outflows, which is a $400B difference.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by projectileboy on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:26PM (#1745444)
I thought the same thing. It looked as though they completely left out weapons procurement outside the scope of the wars, which seems almost dishonest. But it feels like I'm nitpicking; overall it's definitely a worthwhile effort.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by hugh3 on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:16PM (#1745419)
If you look at the pdf from the think tank which came up with it, you'll see that one of their arguments for doing it this way is that "An educated taxpayer is a progressive's best customer", leaving no doubt what their political agenda is.

Somewhat disingenuous from a think tank called the "Third Way", which was originally intended to imply centrism. Still, it's a general law of NPR reporting that a left-wing think tank is called a "think tank" and a right-wing think tank is called a "right-wing think tank".

Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by Poiesis on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:31PM (#1745463)
Still, it's a general law of NPR reporting that a left-wing think tank is called a "think tank" and a right-wing think tank is called a "right-wing think tank".

I don't really have a dog in this fight, but a quick search suggests you may be mistaken. [site:npr.org "right-wing think tank"] os 8 results; [site:npr.org "think tank"] has about 2380. Nothing funny in robots.txt.

But you never know, maybe there aren't that many transcripts on there or something...

Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by hugh3 on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:46PM (#1745502)
Or perhaps they rarely quote right-wing think tanks?

Still, a bit more googling:

7 hits for "right-wing think tank" vs 4 hits for "left-wing think tank", so apparently they don't use either term very often.

1200 hits for "liberal think tank" vs 285 for "conservative think tank" vs 447 for "libertarian think tank" (all of which seem to be Cato) vs 6 for "moderate think tank".

3 for "Republican think tank", 345 for "Democratic think tank" and 57 for "non-partisan think tank"

I take your point, though. What you'd really need to do in order to analyze bias would be to check out "think tank" is used without an adjective and figure out what kind of think tanks those are.

Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by yv on Friday October 01, 2010 @09:10AM (#1746889)
These numbers of grossly inaccurate. Go to the last results page of each query to see the real hit count.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by carbocation on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:40PM (#1745481)
And 4 results for [site:npr.org "left-wing think tank"]
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by eli on Thursday September 30, 2010 @09:23PM (#1745609)
Do you have any data to back that up?

The empirical evidence shows that, for example, NPR is more likely to interview a conservative economist about a story than a liberal. I think they go out of their way to defer to right-of-center politicians because they are so afraid of the perception that they're liberal.

In short, I think you're wrong.

Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by jbellis on Thursday September 30, 2010 @11:29PM (#1745871)
> The empirical evidence shows that, for example, NPR is more likely to interview a conservative economist about a story than a liberal.

To be meaningful, we'd need to compare the ratio of conservative economists on NPR to conservative economists in the population.

Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by jimbokun on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:59PM (#1745535)
So only progressives want to know how much we spend in Iraq and Afghanistan? Depressing, if true.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by pigbucket on Thursday September 30, 2010 @07:58PM (#1745370)
Well, actually it's Thirdway.org, who've been plugging this idea for a few years now, but since it's somewhat progressive too, your point may stand. My sense was that Thirdway was deliberately trying to avoid being overly inflammatory: they don't, for instance, specify the amount of military aid to Colombia to fight the drug war, or the amount to Pakistan to fight terrorists, or to Israel to fight whoever Israel ends up fighting next.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by hugh3 on Thursday September 30, 2010 @07:36PM (#1745308)
Your comment would have been much better without injecting your own political opinions on the matter via the parenthetical "as they should be".
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by nhebb on Thursday September 30, 2010 @09:02PM (#1745541)
Everyone should be critical of wars. I think there's a knee jerk reaction to label war critics as partisan, but questioning war really should be apolitical. I'm a veteran (go 10th Mountain!) and a Republican, and I'm critical of wars. I don't feel that we have a clear, achievable goal in Afghanistan, and I'm appalled at the complete apathy by the media and America public to the fact that we are at war, both taking and losing lives.
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by Legion on Thursday September 30, 2010 @09:12PM (#1745585)
An important point. Also important: "critical" is not a synonym for "anti-".
Re:Thanks For Paying Taxes. Here's A Receipt. by Aetius on Thursday September 30, 2010 @07:47PM (#1745336)
I'm actually not one of those antiwar protesters that crawls in ditches. I didn't say "they should be against" the wars. I just said they should be critical of it; as a publication-of-record it's their job to critique major national issues.