Re:Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old...
by Doxin on Thursday June 28, 2018 @03:44AM
(#17414858)
He's taking the running average of the partial sums:
The partial sum would end up being equal to the final sum by definition when you're done summing all items. Since we're talking about infinite sequences you're never done summing all items so you'll have to do something else to end up with an answer. for example seeing which way the partial sum trends. In this case it trends solidly in the direction of 1/2
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old...
by Koshkin on Thursday June 28, 2018 @07:42AM
(#17416019)
> In this case it trends solidly in the direction of 1/2
...except that it doesn't; to me, it even looks more like it trends in the opposite direction, i.e. it is trying to stay away from 1/2.
Re:Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old...
by whatshisface on Thursday June 28, 2018 @08:50AM
(#17416402)
The farthest it could get from 1/2 would be if it ran off to + or - infinity. Hovering between +1 and -1 could be compared to an orbit.
Re:Mathematician-M.D. claims to have solved the 110-year-old...
by hammock on Thursday June 28, 2018 @07:49AM
(#17416064)
>...except that it doesn't; to me, it even looks more like it trends in the opposite direction, i.e. it is trying to stay away from 1/2.
Like two magnets repelling each other: if you were to hold them together and we call that 1/2 - but they are always trying to push away from each other!