How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D

Re:How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D by coldtea on Thursday June 21, 2018 @04:16AM (#17363097)

>.NET, Java are good COBOL replacements.

Not even close.

As for the links, those are still about COBOL the language.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D by pjmlp on Thursday June 21, 2018 @04:32AM (#17363176)

I guess you need to inform yourself about migration projects that use those products to bring COBOL codebases to modern platforms, where new features are then written in Java/.NET languages, while the old working code is left as is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D by coldtea on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:11AM (#17364351)

Nobody argued that new features could be "written in Java/.NET languages".

Not even that COBOL codebases could be bridged and work "left as is" alongside those.

The main objection was with the word "good".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D by pjmlp on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:26AM (#17364442)

Except you have your definition of "good" and I have mine.

This statement is meaningless without additional information.

> COBOL has no decent replacements.

[ Parent | on HN ]