News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D by coldtea on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:11AM (#17364351)
Nobody argued that new features could be "written in Java/.NET languages".

Not even that COBOL codebases could be bridged and work "left as is" alongside those.

The main objection was with the word "good".

Re:How an Engineering Company Chose to Migrate to D by pjmlp on Thursday June 21, 2018 @08:26AM (#17364442)
Except you have your definition of "good" and I have mine.

This statement is meaningless without additional information.

> COBOL has no decent replacements.