I don't think any hardware manufacturer will touch Hackintoshing; previous company in that space (Psystar) was sued out of existence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psystar_Corporation

Obviously if a company isn't selling product with OSX installed it's different, but any marketing that suggests it would likely be problematic. Besides, the community has done a pretty good job of identifying compatible hardware

http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

The difference is Psystar:

1) Was kind of a scam

2) Sold computers with OS X already installed

2 is the real violation that got them sued. Obviously it's legal to sell computers that are compatible with OS X. Selling them with OS X installed in violation of Apple's EULA is a good way to end up in court.

I literally acknowledged this point:

> Obviously if a company isn't selling product with OSX installed it's different

> Obviously it's legal to sell computers that are compatible with OS X

Never said it wasn't. Only that most companies wouldn't market their product's alternative illegal uses, as that puts them in a gray area. (Almost every product can be used for illegal purposes after all)

They don't have to make it public knowledge... it's just, behind the scenes, they try to prioritize designs that are easily Hackintoshable