Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by parimm on Friday June 08, 2018 @07:23AM
(#17264280)
Just a small clarification,
The chiller is rated at
1.7kW thermal while consuming
1kW electrical
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by hpcjoe on Friday June 08, 2018 @09:23AM
(#17265003)
That's about 1/2 tonne of AC. Insane ...
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by raverbashing on Friday June 08, 2018 @07:33AM
(#17264320)
(and before anyone complains, yes, thermal pumps can have greater than 100% "efficiency" - that is: heat transported per energy spent)
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by kdmytro on Friday June 08, 2018 @06:35AM
(#17264116)
What's 1k7W?
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by meta_AU on Friday June 08, 2018 @06:42AM
(#17264145)
Shorthand for 1.7kW or 1,700 Watts. The shorthand is common in some fields, I've mostly seen it in electronics where you might have 4k7 to represent 4.7 kOhm or 4,700 Ohms.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by hpcjoe on Friday June 08, 2018 @09:21AM
(#17264989)
This is a new one to this old dog. 2k18 is 2018. 1k7 looks to me like 1007. Much shorter to use 1.7kW which most know how to parse to 1.7 x 10<sup>3</sup> Watts.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by klodolph on Friday June 08, 2018 @09:47AM
(#17265284)
I can vouch for the fact that 1k7=1700 is a common convention. It comes from the face that . can be hard to read sometimes. You often also see something like an “0R5” resistor which is 500 milliohms.
More common in EE contexts than anywhere else.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by cmroanirgo on Saturday June 09, 2018 @01:18AM
(#17271663)
Sorry to break the news, but 2k18 is 2180. You're a few years off.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by aekotra on Saturday June 09, 2018 @01:37AM
(#17271704)
It's not. "2k" is pronounced "two thousand". "2k18" is "two thousand eighteen".
For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHL_2K
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by berti on Friday June 08, 2018 @06:52AM
(#17264182)
You, but in the case where the shorthand is required, the suffix (W in this case) is also dropped, or at least has been every time I've seen or used it.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by ianai on Friday June 08, 2018 @08:11AM
(#17264513)
Never saw that once in EE.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by skriticos2 on Friday June 08, 2018 @08:30AM
(#17264641)
It's a fairly common notation on printed circuit board resistors where a dot could get lost. Better readability. They usually drop the suffix though, not sure if it's common for non-resistance items to use, but I got what he was trying to say.
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by stephengillie on Friday June 08, 2018 @09:03AM
(#17264842)
A similar shorthand exists for calendar years - e.g. "2k8" means "2008".
Re:Intel: We 'Forgot' to Mention 28-Core, 5-GHz CPU Demo Was...
by NickNameNick on Friday June 08, 2018 @09:31AM
(#17265101)
which is clearly different to 2k8 meaning 2800.
(or 1k7 meaning either 1700 or 1007...)
However, the best part is that now Intel cannot argue that overclocking is unintended as they bloody set 2.7Ghz chip to run at 5Ghz, albeit for like 5seconds. (I doubt the cooling would even survive a minute)