You’ve attended the canvassing board meetings?
You’ve audited an election?
You vetted the certification of the hardware, software, rules, procedures used by your jurisdiction?
You’ve collaborated with the nationwide network of admins, vendors, academics, and activists on these issues?
Can you refute anything I’ve stated?
Do you even know how your ballot is processed?
Did I say anything about fraud?
FUD indeed.
FWIW, you perfectly illustrate the challenges whistleblowers endure, so thanks for that.
It's on par with "you've inspected the rain clouds, you've watched the rain fall into the Bull run watershed, you've inspected the reservoirs, the pipes, done salinity and chlorination tests on your tap water?"
Voter fraud in Oregon is virtually non-existent, and all you can do is raise the spectre of I don't even know what. It'd be silly if it weren't so insulting, what you're suggesting.
have you ever audited an election... rolling eyes
Oh. You weren't asking.
You're mocking the notion that such a thing is knowable, that there's an objective reality.
I know. Facts, data, experience, critical analysis are all so unkewl. My bad.
Would you please (re-)read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and post civilly and substantively, or not at all?
This is FUD, to dust off an old chestnut, at least as far as Oregon is concerned.
Check it: https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&q=oregon+vote+by+m...
In the 2016 election, a potential 54 cases of voter fraud. Here's the breakdown of the kind of fraud (which amounts to .002% of ballots -- one in 38,000):
"Richardson said the suspicious ballots broke down into several categories: 46 voters appeared to vote in Oregon and another state; six individuals listed as deceased voted; and two voters registered in Oregon voted twice."