We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud

Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud by Frondo on Thursday June 07, 2018 @09:48PM (#17261921)

This is such a ridiculous reply. "You've audited an election?"

It's on par with "you've inspected the rain clouds, you've watched the rain fall into the Bull run watershed, you've inspected the reservoirs, the pipes, done salinity and chlorination tests on your tap water?"

Voter fraud in Oregon is virtually non-existent, and all you can do is raise the spectre of I don't even know what. It'd be silly if it weren't so insulting, what you're suggesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud by specialist on Friday June 08, 2018 @08:50AM (#17264762)

I'm sorry you're offended by things I didn't say. I now feel silly and ridiculous. Thank you for setting me straight.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud by Frondo on Saturday June 09, 2018 @02:47PM (#17274393)

You're welcome.

have you ever audited an election... rolling eyes

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud by specialist on Saturday June 09, 2018 @07:17PM (#17275532)

Yes, I have.

Oh. You weren't asking.

You're mocking the notion that such a thing is knowable, that there's an objective reality.

I know. Facts, data, experience, critical analysis are all so unkewl. My bad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud by dang on Saturday June 09, 2018 @08:02PM (#17275695)

You've been breaking the site guidelines a lot lately and getting into political flamewars. We ban accounts that do that, and have asked you more than once before to stop.

Would you please (re-)read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and post civilly and substantively, or not at all?

[ Parent | on HN ]