Issue list: https://github.com/jfitzell/mozilla-keychain/issues/88#issue...
And in every topic like this, ones about Mozilla's spending (or sometimes Chrome or any other org that has a popular, free product), someone feels the need to say "but why not this one bug that I harp on?" really, really consistently.
How was it low content? In a post about spending am I not allowed to specify my opinion about the spending? You can think of me as some entitled jerk and that's your opinion and I myself doubt I might be acting like one. "But" I would expect that you would allow me to at least say how I feel about it. It's not a technical debate, there can be multiple points of view not necessarily right or wrong.
No, you really don't. You donate to the Mozilla Foundation, who are the non-profit parent company who do these kinds of things, not build Firefox. Firefox is made by their subsidiary Corporation, who cannot accept your donations.
The Corporation doesn't even need your donations anyway; they make a lot more revenue than the donations Mozilla receives.
However, the more you donate, the larger the whole company is allowed to grow while legally being a non-profit. Also, the more is donated, the more they are allowed to transfer between the Foundation and the Corporation.
But you are still not ultimately donating to Firefox. You are donating to the Foundation, who need the money more in the first place so that the whole can legally remain a non-profit, even if they earn more revenue.
Whether or not you feel they should have more money to work with is up to you, but I note that quite a few people seem to wish that Mozilla could do pie-in-the-sky stuff like manage their own user clouds and VPNs and search engines while not remaining motivated by shareholder profits.
I mean it’s all good and fine but please also focus on the one thing you are supposed to be doing primarily.
Disclaimer: I donate to Firefox.