"Why is an organization spending their money on things that I personally don't care about? Large groups of people can only do ever one thing at a time and problems can always be solved faster by throwing money at them."

Are you making this statement after looking at the issues I linked?

Nice - can't have a Mozilla related article without someone posting their pet bug.

Why not? Do you feel what I wrote was unrelated, off topic, not important?

Yeah, it was a really low content post, for sure. It didn't have much to do with the article at all - or even the same organization, technically.

And in every topic like this, ones about Mozilla's spending (or sometimes Chrome or any other org that has a popular, free product), someone feels the need to say "but why not this one bug that I harp on?" really, really consistently.

Treating users this way "harping about a bug" is a surefire way to lose market share. I wonder if this is really the case. I didn't know about the organisational structure. For a lot of people Mozilla IS Firefox.

How was it low content? In a post about spending am I not allowed to specify my opinion about the spending? You can think of me as some entitled jerk and that's your opinion and I myself doubt I might be acting like one. "But" I would expect that you would allow me to at least say how I feel about it. It's not a technical debate, there can be multiple points of view not necessarily right or wrong.

Whataboutmeism in Open Source is just as toxic as Whataboutism is to Politics.