Serious answer: Most companies big enough to care about this sort of thing have a list of approved open source licenses, which their lawyers have read and decided they're ok with. Using a license not on that list means you need to talk to the lawyers. That usually takes a few days of back and forth emails.

As an example, WTFPL is on IBM's list of acceptable open-source licenses.

Complying with the letter of an ambiguously drafted license is quite challenging, but it's important if you are an entity with a lot of assets and thus a plump target for a lawsuit.

The JSON license has made a lot of lawyers a lot of money.

If the license isn't on a pre-approved list I have to send it to the in house legal team. Good Luck With That!!

The licenses aren't "do-whatever-you-want". They have jokes in them that are legally confounding.