News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by DoreenMichele on Friday June 01, 2018 @04:09PM (#17209648)
In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread or violate the GDPR.

-- Anatole France (I might have edited that quote slightly)

Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by glogla on Saturday June 02, 2018 @01:34PM (#17215504)
I have seen many people complain about how it is unfair that small companies also have to do due diligence with people's data, not just he big ones. It seems really mind-boggling to me.

Is it also unfair that both small and large companies aren't allowed to pour acid into rivers? Should they get an exception?

Should only large restaurants be forbidden from serving rotten food? Should small car makers have exceptions to car safety and emission standards?

Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by DoreenMichele on Saturday June 02, 2018 @01:40PM (#17215527)
Is it also unfair that both small and large companies aren't allowed to pour acid into rivers? Should they get an exception?

Funny you should say that because I'm an environmental studies major and we do, in essence, let small shops do exactly that. Most toxic chemicals are disposed of in residential and commercial trash because they are being disposed of in small quantities. You basically do have to exceed a certain threshold before certain regulations apply to your toxic waste, such as household batteries.

We encourage consumers to recycle tech. We sometimes tack on some kind of environmental related tax or surcharge to try to cover the cost, but it is paid up front, it is a small amount and we know the fee at the time of purchase. But we don't set bear traps that can ruin your life because you put an old computer in the trash can instead of disposing of it properly, for example.

Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by glogla on Sunday June 03, 2018 @04:28PM (#17221627)
But this is not about people recycling something wrong on accident, it's about companies not doing so on purpose because it saves them money.

GDPR was never about normal people, it was about companies. Trying to reframe it like it's about people is disingenuous. It is supposed to protect people, yes, but from people like you company owners and executives and others who think "screw everything, I'm looking at my bottom line".

You ignored the example with food, so I'm sure you already know this.

Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by etatoby on Saturday June 02, 2018 @05:44AM (#17213778)
OMG this is perfect! I'm so stealing this quote. It applies to so much it's scary.
Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by DoreenMichele on Saturday June 02, 2018 @12:08PM (#17215143)
You could change "I might have edited this quote slightly" to "DoreenMichele might have edited this quote slightly." Then it is totally not stealing because it cites your source. Bonus: When people get too up in arms, you have someone else to blame.

;)

Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by lovemenot on Saturday June 02, 2018 @06:52AM (#17213970)
But in this context it really doesn't work well as an analogy.

Few rich people have any inclination to sleep rough, whereas many wealthy tech companies have been happily selling their users' data as the law allowed it.

Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by drcode on Saturday June 02, 2018 @11:07AM (#17214879)
The idea is large companies can afford the compliance costs.
Re:Shutting Down Forum (GDPR) by DoreenMichele on Saturday June 02, 2018 @11:53AM (#17215063)
The idea is large companies can steal many loaves of bread and get away with it on a technicality because they have the resources to comply with the letter of the law while pissing on its spirit.

Only little people would steal a crust of bread for their supper. The rich generally commit bigger crimes.