Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by jcranmer on Thursday May 31, 2018 @09:14PM
(#17201796)
Well, not so much states that voted for Trump, but small-population states that rack up lots of Senate votes. Put punitive tariffs on corn, soybean, and pork exports, and you'll have a dozen senators imploring Trump to back off.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by craftyguy on Thursday May 31, 2018 @09:30PM
(#17201881)
Interesting that it's perfectly legal for foreign nations to pressure folks into voting one way or another by punishing them for voting in a particular president (and possibly hurting his/his party's chances of re-election), but it's not if they run ads to try and pursuade voters.
It's almost like indirect election influencing vs direct election influencing (Russia in 2016). Somehow one is bad, but the other isn't.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by john00088876 on Thursday May 31, 2018 @09:36PM
(#17201926)
It’s completely fair to target them since they’re responsible for choosing the administration who initiated this, and it’s totally clear what’s going on. Very different than dishonest manipulation of people’s ideas through fabrications. Targeted consequences to actions as a retaliation are very different to secret manipulation ahead of an election.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by hangonhn on Thursday May 31, 2018 @09:36PM
(#17201925)
I think it's a question of enforcement. You can enforce direct influence in the US because it usually happens on US soil or via US companies but indirect influence via tariffs is nearly impossible since foreign countries largely get to impose rules about what happens in their own country and this is what tariffs are.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by chillwaves on Thursday May 31, 2018 @10:07PM
(#17202071)
The difference is when a US candidate works with a foreign power to win. You really don't see the distinction?
Foreign governments do lobby our government, and register for the privilege. This is not the same as Trump Jr conspiring with Russians in Trump tower.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by s2g on Friday June 01, 2018 @03:26PM
(#17209089)
All's fair in love and [trade] war.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by jcranmer on Thursday May 31, 2018 @10:57PM
(#17202250)
It's not about targeting people because they voted for Trump. It's about targeting a small, export-focused segment of the economy that has outsized political power. Agricultural sectors of the economy tend to fit this billet in pretty much every country, which is why agricultural tariffs are the thorniest parts of trade agreements.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by seanmcdirmid on Thursday May 31, 2018 @11:04PM
(#17202276)
To be fair, targeting small republican states can be effective, while targeting democrat states would be totally ineffective considering they would vote against the president anyways.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p...
by toomanybeersies on Thursday May 31, 2018 @10:18PM
(#17202109)
That's exactly what they do already. That's why the EU is putting tariffs on things like Bourbon Whiskey.