News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Possible BGP hijack of 1.1.1.1. Parent comment

Re:Possible BGP hijack of 1.1.1.1 by tazjin on Tuesday May 29, 2018 @11:08AM (#17179816)
It shouldn't really matter who is currently using that net, it's not a private range :/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Possible BGP hijack of 1.1.1.1 by jedisct1 on Tuesday May 29, 2018 @11:38AM (#17180111)
Tell Cisco.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Possible BGP hijack of 1.1.1.1 by walrus01 on Tuesday May 29, 2018 @12:13PM (#17180465)
Both Cisco and Juniper use the standardized documentation IP ranges in their example/lab configurations and training materials.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5735

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5737

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Possible BGP hijack of 1.1.1.1 by detaro on Tuesday May 29, 2018 @12:17PM (#17180497)
Cisco did recommend to use 1.1.1.1 (or did default to? commentary online is unclear), but in a different space: for the DHCP server with DHCP proxying in their WLAN products. They might be referring to that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Possible BGP hijack of 1.1.1.1 by alberts00 on Tuesday May 29, 2018 @03:06PM (#17182065)
I have been going through Cisco Netacad materials for last 2 years and I've seen 1.1.1.1 in examples. Though I just did a search and did not see 1.1.1.1 mentioned anymore.
[ Parent | on HN ]