Re:Jim Black's Steve Jobs Story
by princekolt on Friday May 18, 2018 @10:52AM
(#17101920)
Not disagreeing with you, but unless I misunderstood something, it seems Jobs sided with John because it was obvious that the design they were going for with MacOS Graphics was wrong, and Jobs was pissed that the Apple engineer tried to defend it. If you ask me that's a perfectly reasonable scenario to get pissed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jim Black's Steve Jobs Story
by AdmiralAsshat on Friday May 18, 2018 @12:08PM
(#17102551)
Except we have no idea WHY the engineer was trying to defend it. He might've been told previously by Jobs himself that their solution was "the" solution and that they wouldn't entertain alternatives.
Imagine how the conversation could've gone if the engineer had agreed with Carmack and Jobs didn't. "Well, yeah, that approach could be better...". Jobs would've probably cut him off for not towing the company line and fired him.
Re:Jim Black's Steve Jobs Story
by privacypoller on Friday May 18, 2018 @01:26PM
(#17103228)
THIS. there are countless stories of this happening inside Jobs' Apple. In fact it was a well known ploy that to get something contentious approved you presented it to Jobs who immediately torpedoed you, then let him stew on it until he later presented your idea back as his own.