Yes, but which one, and which version? This is especially painful with Python ;)

Use Ruby. It doesn't change much from version to version, thank God. I curse python every time I have to install a package. Nothing Just Works.

If you install just one gem, bundler, you can get dependency management in a one-file script. Checkout Bundler Inline:

https://github.com/bundler/bundler/blob/master/lib/bundler/i...

What's painful about Python but not so for others? Writing anything complicated in bash/zsh is painful enough I wouldn't even think about it.

2 vs 3 is not a small change. and tools for helping you do things (like a 3+2 compatibility lib) get installed with pip... which is horrifyingly fragile. `pip install your-lib` -> you have no idea if you have the dependencies you require, because pip doesn't behave rationally. it often Just Works™, but when it doesn't there's no help and a massive minefield of potential problems.

I currently find some users have python2, some have python3, some both. It's fine in a controlled environment, or if your users are Devs, but a pain with normal users who I just want to send a script to.

KotlinScript is yet another option that handles that worry nicely.

https://github.com/holgerbrandl/kscript

Is there an easy way to run shell commands in Python, like backticks in PERL, Ruby or even PHP?

I'd really like to use Python more often, but most of the time it only complicates things with those verbose syscalls.

IPython. Seems to work for simple stuff like `ls blah`, but I'm not aware how far this stretches, and is probably not super safe to use.

EDIT: Seems I've only tried too basic things - it works thanks to %automagic, and seemingly %man is a thing. Other option is to use %%sh or %%bash, but that's a bit verbose.

Check out python sh: https://github.com/amoffat/sh

>sh.ls("-l", "/tmp", color="never")

Nope. I really need to be able to test commands on the terminal and then copy/paste them without any modifications. I won't even try to get used to that stupid syntax.

Unfortunately not. I have used Ruby a little bit and that is really nice feature.

part of the complication is due to actually having the proper data seperation that you need to jump through hoops to get in bash. If you go with backtick style calls you lose a lot of that.

os.system() (https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/238185)

Except for perl, python and ruby are rarely on container images and AMIs I interact with unless they are needed for the application itself to minimize attack surfaces and vectors. Perl is installed sometimes due to dependent packages that themselves depend on perl, but that's becoming much less true as time goes on. With Docker it's also very easy to keep your image super minimal. Most of the time we don't even have bash installed (just sh).