Python startup time: milliseconds matter

Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter by adrianN on Thursday May 03, 2018 @12:34AM (#16983371)

Language features aside, Rust is a lot nicer to work with because it has cargo and using libraries is no longer a pain.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter by pjmlp on Thursday May 03, 2018 @03:14AM (#16983963)

Depends which libraries we are talking about, try to use GUI libraries from Rust.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter by mratsim on Thursday May 03, 2018 @04:25AM (#16984234)

That isn't fair, all languages besides JS+HTML+CSS have issues with GUI libraries. Either you go Electron/webview or you have to deal with Qt/GTK for cross-platform GUI.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter by pjmlp on Thursday May 03, 2018 @04:53AM (#16984357)

Sure it is fair, Java, C++, C#, VB.NET, Delphi, Objective-C, Swift have quite good GUI libraries available.

And regarding JS+HTML+CSS, they are still on the stone age of RAD tooling.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter by mratsim on Thursday May 03, 2018 @11:43AM (#16986985)

I think you missed the cross-platform part of my answer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter by pjmlp on Thursday May 03, 2018 @12:48PM (#16987572)

Some of those languages do have cross-platform GUI offerings.

Even AWT is better than any option currently natively available to Rust.

After all, "using libraries is no longer a pain" is not what I felt when converting an old toy application from Gtkmm to Gtk-rs.

[ Parent | on HN ]