News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by ryanlol on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @12:47PM (#16968743)
It is utterly ridiculous that iOS is still lacking support for this super basic feature.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by giarc on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @01:36PM (#16969283)
It's not really a basic feature. The sandboxing of iOS apps is smart in many ways. Allowing 3rd party access to an native Apple app could open up problems.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by bcholmes on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @01:43PM (#16969351)
Apple can implement "record call" in the standard phone app, though, without allowing 3rd party access.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by freeone3000 on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @01:44PM (#16969358)
You don't need to solve the general case, just the specific one - add recording to dialer.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by jgh on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @03:10PM (#16970359)
They already allow recording the audio from other apps, other than through audio plugins which apps have to purposefully implement, via ReplayKit.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by mcherm on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @01:57PM (#16969506)
But there's a good reason for that -- as long as legislatures keep making it ILLEGAL to use such a feature, can you really blame Apple for not wanting to offer it?
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by LukeShu on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @02:04PM (#16969607)
It is not illegal to use such a feature.

In some states ("multi-party consent" states), it is illegal to use the feature without the consent of the person being recorded; just like in some situations it is illegal to use the "camera" feature without the consent of the person being recorded. That doesn't stop Apple for offering a camera on their phone.

Other states have "one-party consent" laws that mean it is always legal for you to record own phone calls.

Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by chipperyman573 on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @02:03PM (#16969596)
It's not illegal federally or in any of the 38 single-party consent states, as long as the person recording is a member of the conversation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#Unite...

Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by smnrchrds on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @05:01PM (#16971577)
And the entire Canada, where the story is taking place, is single-party consent.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by kevin_thibedeau on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @02:49PM (#16970143)
It wasn't legal to rip CDs in many places of the world but they promoted it heavily.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by ryanlol on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @02:29PM (#16969898)
What legislatures would those be?