News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What I learned by living without artificial light by diffeomorphism on Thursday April 26, 2018 @10:08PM (#16937943)
The LEDs you linked are also about twice as bright at 1/5th the power consumption.

Say you have one light bulb running three hours per day (living room, kitchen or office in the evening seems realistic). It uses 20 W more than the LED and using $0.15 per kWh (average rate in California) this gives

20 W* 3h * $0.15/(1000 Wh) * 365 = $3.29 every year

If you regularly use two incandescent bulbs the "more expensive package" paid for itself within a year and gives you brighter light at the same time.

Re:What I learned by living without artificial light by dylan604 on Friday April 27, 2018 @12:15AM (#16938415)
But that involves math. The average consumer isn't looking at that. They just look at the prices in front of them.

I really think the price/wattage comparison thing needs to be the entire packaging design. I overheard a sales person helping a shopper choosing a generator size by adding up the wattage of all of the devices needed including lights. I turned into the conversation to politely suggest using LEDs for lighting because of the lower wattage requirements. Both the sales person and the shopper were shocked at the difference.