Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by mLuby on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @01:51PM
(#16924138)
The benefits of remote work go disproportionately to workers, while the detriments seem to fall toward managers. Since it's managers deciding whether to hire remote or on-site, it's not that surprising that they act in their own interest and hire on-site, even if it's more expensive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by losteric on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @02:00PM
(#16924231)
My manager has repeatedly encouraged us to work from home, because we're space constrained (loud), but I have absolutely no desire to do so... why would I want to bring work in to my own home? If the business is fine with my productivity hit, so am I.
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by softawre on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @02:44PM
(#16924683)
Would you be willing to "split the difference" on your commute if they allowed working at home? Instead of driving 2 hours a day, you'd work an extra hour every day?
Maybe if it was structured like this then it would be more win/win.