Re:TSMC Kicks Off Volume Production of 7nm Chips
by tfha on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @11:27PM
(#16918455)
Uh, it's the other way around. 10nm Intel is 7nm global foundries. 22nm Intel is superior to 14nm global foundries.
Intel is the one that doesn't fudge their numbers.
Re:TSMC Kicks Off Volume Production of 7nm Chips
by km3k on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @09:20AM
(#16921269)
Intel still fudges their numbers. They just fudge their numbers less than everyone else.
Re:TSMC Kicks Off Volume Production of 7nm Chips
by Valmar on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @11:06AM
(#16922154)
How so?
The numbers don't seem to have much relation at all with all of the real process node numbers.
Re:TSMC Kicks Off Volume Production of 7nm Chips
by Valmar on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @08:13AM
(#16920769)
Even Intel's numbers are just marketing, however.
Everyone is fudging the numbers...
SemiWiki has a good overview of Intel 10nm vs GF 7nm:
https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/7191-iedm-2017-intel-...
Re:TSMC Kicks Off Volume Production of 7nm Chips
by makomk on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @09:00AM
(#16921103)
For a while I think it was the other way around: Intel's processes were, in practice, actually substantially less dense than their competitors at the same nominal process node size.
But yes, the industry needs standardized advertising practices badly.