Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by nodesocket on Monday April 23, 2018 @11:42PM
(#16909679)
No TLS on jenkins-x.com, tisk tisk.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by tuananh on Monday April 23, 2018 @11:46PM
(#16909702)
it's using github pages for the main website i think so i'm not sure if it's possible to setup custom domain + custom ssl cert for it?
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by samridh90 on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:03AM
(#16909761)
It's possible but not very straightforward.
Reference for anyone else trying to setup ssl cert for github pages: https://www.jonathan-petitcolas.com/2017/01/13/using-https-w...
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by EnderMB on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @04:32AM
(#16910901)
For a long time it wasn't, but it looks like GitHub are slowly rolling this out to people.
Given that Jenkins is pretty popular, you'd think that they'd be able to sort something out with GitHub to get bumped up the list for something along these lines.
There's always the Cloudfare option, but I've never felt that this was an ideal solution when HTTPS should be extremely straightforward for GitHub to set up on their pages.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by nodesocket on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:01AM
(#16909757)
Should be able to use CloudFlare and "flexible" SSL setup. CNAME at the apex pointing to GitHub pages.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by LethargicStud on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:05AM
(#16909770)
Please don't do this. It gives the user the illusion that their connection is secure, but the connection between Cloudflare and the site is not secure. Arguably it's better to encrypt some of the route rather than none of it, but also giving people a false sense of security comes with its own drawbacks.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by nodesocket on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:09AM
(#16909781)
Actually "flexible" might not be needed, "full" without strict should work. Traffic is still over TLS, but a valid named certificate is not required.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by jhasse on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @02:19AM
(#16910317)
I think the user mostly cares about his connection to anything outside his network (e.g. for public WiFis).
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by manigandham on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:41AM
(#16909884)
You should set it to "Full" instead. That will use TLS but won't verify the domain name in the certificate like it does in "Strict" mode so you can still use Github pages.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by jsmeaton on Monday April 23, 2018 @11:51PM
(#16909717)
I've used cloudflare to do SSL for a custom github pages domain before.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by jstrachan on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @04:21AM
(#16910843)
whoops, great catch thanks. Hoping we can figure out a fix very soon...
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by spockz on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:12AM
(#16909800)
I’m using netlify[1] to host my site and it supports tls on public domains - through let’s encrypt - and http2 out of the box.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub...
by pronoiac on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @02:02AM
(#16910249)
Huh, they're using Github pages. I thought if you set up a redirect - a C dns response - to whatever.github.io, that would soothe the ssl complaints in the browser.
Looking at the dns records, it looks like they didn't do this, and instead set up an A record.
I realized Github probably documents this, and found: https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-...
My suggestion would likely work for a www subdomain, but not for the apex domain.